One Day
Every time I look at the sky after the rain
I think of the crybaby I used to be
I was blindly chasing after someone's back
Saying "I want to be stronger"
Now faded into the wind is "thank you"
Am I getting stronger?
Since I haven't got an answer to that
I'll keep walking forward
So let's go
Will never stop
Won't lose against the flow of time
I'll keep getting back up
Because I don't want to lose something precious
The voice flowing inside of me
Always always supports me
Teasing rain will get in my way
Because I won't run away Oh
So let's go
Will never stop
Won't lose against the flow of time
I'll keep getting back up
Because I don't want to lose something precious
I believe in that future...
===========================================
it was said that this song is written by the artist with the message "protecting the things that are important to me".
Okay. Love the message. Wish I can do the same.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Friday, July 23, 2010
Daang Matuwid pala ha... Hahahaha!
At ito pala ang tinatawag na daang matuwid. Napakagaling.
Mula sa balitang pinapangalandakan ni Kabayan sa radyo (wala pang mahanap na write-up tungkol dito), mukhang aktibo na ang BIR sa pagsasakatuparan ng kanilang tungkuling maabot ang target collection at makalikom ng malaking salapi mula sa buwis na ibinabayad ng mga mamamayan.
KAYA LANG, E 'BAT naman pati mga maliliit na manggagawa eh papatawan pa ng EVAT?
Sige, sabihin ng "nakikinabang" din sila diumano sa mga proyekto ng gobyerno. Eh bakit sa dinami-dami ng mga malalaking negosyante at propesyonal na kumikita ng milyon-milyon eh uunahin pa nilang kolektahan itong mga naghihikahos na nga sa buhay? Ay kainaman naman!
At kailangan pa daw mag-issue ng resibo ng mga tricycle/pedicab driver sa mga pasahero. (Facepalm!!!)
Ano ba ang kinikita ng mga driver/tindera at iba pang maliliit na negosyante/manggagawa kumpara sa sandamukal na salaping ibinubulsa ng mga mayayamang may-ari ng negosyo, mga accountant, abogado, IT experts, manager, artista, smugglers este yung mga negosyanteng madaming itinatago, at madami pang ibang mga "Bigtime" kumbaga?
Bakit hindi nila unahing habulin itong mga tax evader at kolektahan ng karampatang buwis iyong mga nalulunod sa pera? Ito ba ang hustisya? Ito ba ang daang matuwid? Ang kaya lang ba nilang pasunurin/pwersahing pasunurin ay itong mga nasa mababang antas ng labor force?
Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap.
Eh pano kung mahirap ang kino-corrupt?
Yan yan. Umayos kayo.
Mula sa balitang pinapangalandakan ni Kabayan sa radyo (wala pang mahanap na write-up tungkol dito), mukhang aktibo na ang BIR sa pagsasakatuparan ng kanilang tungkuling maabot ang target collection at makalikom ng malaking salapi mula sa buwis na ibinabayad ng mga mamamayan.
KAYA LANG, E 'BAT naman pati mga maliliit na manggagawa eh papatawan pa ng EVAT?
Sige, sabihin ng "nakikinabang" din sila diumano sa mga proyekto ng gobyerno. Eh bakit sa dinami-dami ng mga malalaking negosyante at propesyonal na kumikita ng milyon-milyon eh uunahin pa nilang kolektahan itong mga naghihikahos na nga sa buhay? Ay kainaman naman!
At kailangan pa daw mag-issue ng resibo ng mga tricycle/pedicab driver sa mga pasahero. (Facepalm!!!)
Ano ba ang kinikita ng mga driver/tindera at iba pang maliliit na negosyante/manggagawa kumpara sa sandamukal na salaping ibinubulsa ng mga mayayamang may-ari ng negosyo, mga accountant, abogado, IT experts, manager, artista, smugglers este yung mga negosyanteng madaming itinatago, at madami pang ibang mga "Bigtime" kumbaga?
Bakit hindi nila unahing habulin itong mga tax evader at kolektahan ng karampatang buwis iyong mga nalulunod sa pera? Ito ba ang hustisya? Ito ba ang daang matuwid? Ang kaya lang ba nilang pasunurin/pwersahing pasunurin ay itong mga nasa mababang antas ng labor force?
Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap.
Eh pano kung mahirap ang kino-corrupt?
Yan yan. Umayos kayo.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
On Change
“Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.” - quoting United States President Barrack Obama’s famous lines about change, it roots from the cliché that “change should start with ourselves”. It is not dependent upon some other external force. No one but ourselves can start the change we so desire.
Change has always been associated with new beginnings.
Whenever something new comes in, the populace always expects that the old system will be changed. The same can be said in the current political situation in the Philippines, wherein a new administration takes over from the former and quite old and infamous one. The rise of Noynoy Aquino as the newly-elected President of the Republic of the Philippines has brought hopes of the country to recover from its deep slump. I think majority, if not of those who voted in his favor sees him as the solution for the country’s traditional problems. “This guy is the legacy of the man who proved that the Filipinos are worth dying for and of the mother of democracy. He is surely capable of developing the country.” – This I think is what those people thought of him. With all due respect, I think otherwise, or should I say, I do not believe it. He might be a son by blood of those so-called “heroes” but that doesn’t necessarily mean that he can imbibe upon the people the same “charisma” or influence the same as his parents. He’ll have to do this in his own way, not just by being branded as the son. He must make a name for himself (which I think, slowly but surely, he’s working out on as of today). But regardless, can one man bring about the change in the society? I don’t think so.
As the above-quoted Obama line states, change is something that will not happen by virtue of other person or time. The message is clear: we should start with ourselves. We should not be waiting for some other person in some other time to make things happen for us. After all, we are living our own life. The fact that it is “exclusively ours” justifies the logic that we should be responsible enough to take care of it, bring about positive changes, and develop it by ourselves. Of course, outside help may be indispensable, but the focal point is it centers on the individual himself. So, talking about change in the larger context, this will mean that a newly installed leader cannot bring about the changes to the country demanded to him ALONE. As he once said, he is not Superman. As if Superman can solve the country’s century-old problems! No one can solve those alone, even if he possesses the highest form of magic or a body of steel.
Then, could this mean that change should start individually, then collectively? Might work.
People change because of some factors: other people or events that tend to influence their behavior, personality, or view of things. Influence from others is different from internal motivation. Although those people had contributed to the “change” in oneself, it can still be inferred that it originated from one’s own volition. The same can be said for the larger circle - the society. Though some other factors might trigger this change, the inherent capacity to do so belongs to the people constituting it.
Then, is it really necessary that something else occurs first before change can happen? It seems that we are always waiting for something unknown, some sort of a different stimulus, before we can realize that we have the ability to change. It may be the natural sequence of things; someone notices something about you, comments negatively or suggests to do an action about it, and in order to conform to that remark, you will try to change. Should things always be like this? We should “change” for “change” to happen. We should be aware enough of our “inner self’ so we will know what needs to be done, instead of depending upon others to point them out.
Nothing stays the same. Change is the only constant things in this world. You cannot step twice on the same river (Heraclitus). These are some of the most famous quotes about change. Among these, I find one that perfectly applies to the “change” I’m referring to in the previous paragraphs:
It's not that some people have willpower and some don't. It's that some people are ready to change and others are not. – (James Gordon)
So, is it about preparedness to change? .
Yes, that’s one point, but that may not be enough. For every new beginning, we are filled with hope that we can finally make those changes happen. We are placing our hopes upon the occurrence of this “something new” believing that it will be the rallying point towards change. But are we prepared for it? Can we accept it immediately? Can we cope up as soon as it takes effect? Can we maintain it? And of course, can we contribute to it? There are still a lot of things to be considered. If so, then we must be ready for all the consequences the transformation might bring us.
I won’t let this end without mentioning one of the most inspiring lines from a man who I owe a great debt of gratitude. I have this instilled with me from the time he shared this insight to us until today. Unfortunately, it seems I have failed to live this up, but I am always trying to do it. These are the lines that I will keep as a guiding principle:
Today, I will start the change I want to see.
- Bro. Rafael Donato, FSC
Change has always been associated with new beginnings.
Whenever something new comes in, the populace always expects that the old system will be changed. The same can be said in the current political situation in the Philippines, wherein a new administration takes over from the former and quite old and infamous one. The rise of Noynoy Aquino as the newly-elected President of the Republic of the Philippines has brought hopes of the country to recover from its deep slump. I think majority, if not of those who voted in his favor sees him as the solution for the country’s traditional problems. “This guy is the legacy of the man who proved that the Filipinos are worth dying for and of the mother of democracy. He is surely capable of developing the country.” – This I think is what those people thought of him. With all due respect, I think otherwise, or should I say, I do not believe it. He might be a son by blood of those so-called “heroes” but that doesn’t necessarily mean that he can imbibe upon the people the same “charisma” or influence the same as his parents. He’ll have to do this in his own way, not just by being branded as the son. He must make a name for himself (which I think, slowly but surely, he’s working out on as of today). But regardless, can one man bring about the change in the society? I don’t think so.
As the above-quoted Obama line states, change is something that will not happen by virtue of other person or time. The message is clear: we should start with ourselves. We should not be waiting for some other person in some other time to make things happen for us. After all, we are living our own life. The fact that it is “exclusively ours” justifies the logic that we should be responsible enough to take care of it, bring about positive changes, and develop it by ourselves. Of course, outside help may be indispensable, but the focal point is it centers on the individual himself. So, talking about change in the larger context, this will mean that a newly installed leader cannot bring about the changes to the country demanded to him ALONE. As he once said, he is not Superman. As if Superman can solve the country’s century-old problems! No one can solve those alone, even if he possesses the highest form of magic or a body of steel.
Then, could this mean that change should start individually, then collectively? Might work.
People change because of some factors: other people or events that tend to influence their behavior, personality, or view of things. Influence from others is different from internal motivation. Although those people had contributed to the “change” in oneself, it can still be inferred that it originated from one’s own volition. The same can be said for the larger circle - the society. Though some other factors might trigger this change, the inherent capacity to do so belongs to the people constituting it.
Then, is it really necessary that something else occurs first before change can happen? It seems that we are always waiting for something unknown, some sort of a different stimulus, before we can realize that we have the ability to change. It may be the natural sequence of things; someone notices something about you, comments negatively or suggests to do an action about it, and in order to conform to that remark, you will try to change. Should things always be like this? We should “change” for “change” to happen. We should be aware enough of our “inner self’ so we will know what needs to be done, instead of depending upon others to point them out.
Nothing stays the same. Change is the only constant things in this world. You cannot step twice on the same river (Heraclitus). These are some of the most famous quotes about change. Among these, I find one that perfectly applies to the “change” I’m referring to in the previous paragraphs:
It's not that some people have willpower and some don't. It's that some people are ready to change and others are not. – (James Gordon)
So, is it about preparedness to change? .
Yes, that’s one point, but that may not be enough. For every new beginning, we are filled with hope that we can finally make those changes happen. We are placing our hopes upon the occurrence of this “something new” believing that it will be the rallying point towards change. But are we prepared for it? Can we accept it immediately? Can we cope up as soon as it takes effect? Can we maintain it? And of course, can we contribute to it? There are still a lot of things to be considered. If so, then we must be ready for all the consequences the transformation might bring us.
I won’t let this end without mentioning one of the most inspiring lines from a man who I owe a great debt of gratitude. I have this instilled with me from the time he shared this insight to us until today. Unfortunately, it seems I have failed to live this up, but I am always trying to do it. These are the lines that I will keep as a guiding principle:
Today, I will start the change I want to see.
- Bro. Rafael Donato, FSC
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Deja Vu
How does it feel to be screamed at the top (or nearly) of somebody else's lungs?
- It feels great! At the least, this is what I expected to receive even before stepping inside the classroom.
For now, I am glad someone recognized how stupid I am.
I am entering ground zero with nothing but guts(and a bit of luck). But (and surely) it seems it wasn't enough.
I am fully aware that we are about to meet "gods" in that place called "hell". We've been warned about it years ago. (I can imagine my former "master" with his pronouncement: "I told you so".) So far, in my second week of classes, there's just one of those gods (errr, or just an apostle maybe). I am not afraid of these gods as long as I know that I have the weapons to neutralize them. Unfortunately,I am very far from reaching those high-powered weapons, only able to bring with me a stick which can barely scratch their gold-plated armors.
So, my first encounter (or should I say "reunion") with a god turned out to be a repeat of my very first actual meeting with such years back. It's obvious that I am not fully prepared for that. I only brought a moist matchstick with me: capable of bringing out sparks but failed to light the grand fire. At the end of the day, I'm worn out of the clash, not realizing that this is just the "initial conflict" of the story.
I am here to build my confidence (which I definitely lack). With this and much knowledge, I will get back to that battlefield and definitely ring the signal to counter-attack.
- It feels great! At the least, this is what I expected to receive even before stepping inside the classroom.
For now, I am glad someone recognized how stupid I am.
I am entering ground zero with nothing but guts(and a bit of luck). But (and surely) it seems it wasn't enough.
I am fully aware that we are about to meet "gods" in that place called "hell". We've been warned about it years ago. (I can imagine my former "master" with his pronouncement: "I told you so".) So far, in my second week of classes, there's just one of those gods (errr, or just an apostle maybe). I am not afraid of these gods as long as I know that I have the weapons to neutralize them. Unfortunately,I am very far from reaching those high-powered weapons, only able to bring with me a stick which can barely scratch their gold-plated armors.
So, my first encounter (or should I say "reunion") with a god turned out to be a repeat of my very first actual meeting with such years back. It's obvious that I am not fully prepared for that. I only brought a moist matchstick with me: capable of bringing out sparks but failed to light the grand fire. At the end of the day, I'm worn out of the clash, not realizing that this is just the "initial conflict" of the story.
I am here to build my confidence (which I definitely lack). With this and much knowledge, I will get back to that battlefield and definitely ring the signal to counter-attack.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Memorize not Understand?
So, despite the confusion three years ago:
http://baliwantunaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/changes-posted-in-fs-blog-may-15-2007.html
Here I am now - Threading the path I once thought of doesn't belong to me. To date, I am still unsure about this. Knowing that I have somehow degraded myself from a lot of activities other than mind-enriching ones(I guess reading manga counts as an exception, but work, yes), I continued walking the path of carnage. The outcome: a weaker me. Maybe it's just me, but it seems that I have lost my ability to quickly grasp things and memorize concepts. (one of the few I can be proud of... before) A good memory is what I need at present. I know it is always essential in studying, although a College Professor insisted before the need to "Analyze and not Memorize". Being his follower (and also 'coz I quite believe in the same), that quote has become a guide in my succeeding classes.
Here comes the "actual" experience. Upon my first step on ground zero, another master in the field made an opposite argument.
"Memorize, not understand".
This could mean literally, or it simply implies to give more priority in memorizing rather than understanding. Well, we all look at the same thing differently (I'm beginning to use this phrase quite often). It depends upon our interpretation, whether this will be construed strictly against us or liberally in favor of the other. [What the hell am I talking about?]
It's a long way to go. I could be derailed from this track, who knows? Might be voluntary or forcibly, whatever happens, I am bound to accept. But for the meantime, I'll persevere to keep in this track until that day comes [or does not come/ Here we go again, stipulating a resolutory condition].
Almost forgot what I need right now.
Read,read and read. Then memorize.
Capacity's running out, maybe I need a new hard drive.
http://baliwantunaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/changes-posted-in-fs-blog-may-15-2007.html
Here I am now - Threading the path I once thought of doesn't belong to me. To date, I am still unsure about this. Knowing that I have somehow degraded myself from a lot of activities other than mind-enriching ones(I guess reading manga counts as an exception, but work, yes), I continued walking the path of carnage. The outcome: a weaker me. Maybe it's just me, but it seems that I have lost my ability to quickly grasp things and memorize concepts. (one of the few I can be proud of... before) A good memory is what I need at present. I know it is always essential in studying, although a College Professor insisted before the need to "Analyze and not Memorize". Being his follower (and also 'coz I quite believe in the same), that quote has become a guide in my succeeding classes.
Here comes the "actual" experience. Upon my first step on ground zero, another master in the field made an opposite argument.
"Memorize, not understand".
This could mean literally, or it simply implies to give more priority in memorizing rather than understanding. Well, we all look at the same thing differently (I'm beginning to use this phrase quite often). It depends upon our interpretation, whether this will be construed strictly against us or liberally in favor of the other. [What the hell am I talking about?]
It's a long way to go. I could be derailed from this track, who knows? Might be voluntary or forcibly, whatever happens, I am bound to accept. But for the meantime, I'll persevere to keep in this track until that day comes [or does not come/ Here we go again, stipulating a resolutory condition].
Almost forgot what I need right now.
Read,read and read. Then memorize.
Capacity's running out, maybe I need a new hard drive.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Post .. To be updated . May 26, 2010.
Will try to update this post next month, another month, another, then a year, another year, and another... :D
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Pambihira!!!
Nakakahighblood ang mga balita ngayon. Talaga naman.
At minsan pa'y nagkaroon na naman ng Secretary of INJUSTICE!!!
Iba na talaga kapag tuta. Tsk tsk. Kabaligtaran kayo ni Hachiko! (pa-plug. ^_^ please do watch Hatchiko: A dog story. Just browse the net or look for your suking SM :D)
Ahmm, di pala, pareho pala sila in one way: LOYAL sa amo.
When does loyalty become a bad thing? - When it causes great harm and suffering to the common good.
At sa pinakahuling binitiwang pahayag ng mamang ewan, dapat lang siguro na mag-bukas na ng entablado para sa isang madugong labanan para sa katarungan. Patuloy na lang ba tayong aasang mabibigay ang Katarungan sa lahat kung ang mismong kamay na naglalapat nito ay ang kabaligtaran ang ginagawa?
Susmaryosep!!!
Tama na ang pang-AAGRAbyado!!! Akala mo kung sinong magaling. Kwestyonable na nga ang posisyon. Nabigyan lang ng konting "kapangyarihan" akala mo na kung sino umasta. Ganito na ba talaga ang mga tagapagtanggol ng katarungan?
Epic Fail!!!
At minsan pa'y nagkaroon na naman ng Secretary of INJUSTICE!!!
Iba na talaga kapag tuta. Tsk tsk. Kabaligtaran kayo ni Hachiko! (pa-plug. ^_^ please do watch Hatchiko: A dog story. Just browse the net or look for your suking SM :D)
Ahmm, di pala, pareho pala sila in one way: LOYAL sa amo.
When does loyalty become a bad thing? - When it causes great harm and suffering to the common good.
At sa pinakahuling binitiwang pahayag ng mamang ewan, dapat lang siguro na mag-bukas na ng entablado para sa isang madugong labanan para sa katarungan. Patuloy na lang ba tayong aasang mabibigay ang Katarungan sa lahat kung ang mismong kamay na naglalapat nito ay ang kabaligtaran ang ginagawa?
Susmaryosep!!!
Tama na ang pang-AAGRAbyado!!! Akala mo kung sinong magaling. Kwestyonable na nga ang posisyon. Nabigyan lang ng konting "kapangyarihan" akala mo na kung sino umasta. Ganito na ba talaga ang mga tagapagtanggol ng katarungan?
Epic Fail!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)